“The
OUR has requested additional information from telecommunications providers LIME
and Digicel on their decision to
block certain providers of Voice over Internet Protocol services on their
network requested information. Among the information requested from the two
companies are data showing the nature of the alleged bypass of their networks
by VoIP providers and its impac. The OUR expects to receive the information
before the end of the month”
Release from the OUR
with regards to their investigations into allegations of bypass by VoIP
Providers such as Viber and Nimbuzz by Digicel and LIME
The
OUR (Office of Utilities Regulation) has decided to consult with industry
players, with the CAC (Consumer Affairs Commission) being drawn into the
discussion to comment on the nature of the alledged bypass as stated in “OUR
seeks clarification on VoIP block”, published Wednesday July 23, 2014, by
Richard Browne, Business Reporter, The
Jamaica Gleaner.
In
the meantime, OUR has allowed the Telecom Providers to continue their blockade
of VoIP Apps such as Viber and Nimbuzz until the end of the month of July 2014
as I’d reported in my blog article
entitled “LIME
and Digicel blocking all VoIP Services - How Telecom Providers can make money
from Regularizing Paid VoIP Services”. It’s hoped by that time, they’ll
hand down a judgement on the VoIP issue.
Telecom
Provider Digicel is adamant that
the VoIP Providers must pay a Toll Access Charge in order to terminate Calls on
their Network, just like any other Telecom Provider, to quote Digicel's Head of Legal and
Legulatory Affairs, Gail Moss-Solomon: “Digicel Jamaica continues to block
unlicensed number-based VoIP operators until a mutually beneficial commercial
relationship can be agreed”
Digicel lifts VoIP
Blockade – TATT spoke early and Haiti’s Telecom Tax is corrupt
Telecom
Provider Digicel has already
lifted the blockade on VoIP Apps such as Viber and Nimbuzz in Trinidad and
Tobago As stated in “TATT
asks Digicel to hold hand on VoIP”, published July 8, 2014 at 9:35 PM ECT
By Joel Julien, The Trinidad Express
and “Trinidad
regulator weighs in on VoIP issue”, Published Thursday July 10, 2014, The Jamaica Gleaner.
This
after Trinidad and Tobago established Telecoms Regulator, TATT
(Telecommunications Authority of Trinidad and Tobago) began dialog from early
and had the blockade removed a week and four days after it came into effect on
Sunday June 29th, 2014.
Telecom
Provider Digicel has also removed
the blockade in Haiti as of Tuesday July 16th 2014, possibly over
concerns relating to the illegal nature of the Telecom Tax imposed by the
Haitian Government led by Prime Minister Laurent Lamothe as chronicled in my blog article
entitled “Digicel
Haiti removes VoIP Apps Blockade – How Laurent Lamothe Administrations Corrupt
Telecom Tax for FNE has French Connection”.
Telecom
Provider Digicel decided that the
losses from VoIP in Haiti, still a growing and now their larges Telecom market
aside from Jamaica, was not worth their reputation being mired in corruption
over the collection of an illegally implemented Telecom Tax.
Digicel, LIME and VoIP
– LIME’s awfully quiet as Business good with Fixed Line and Broadband
Many
may notice Telecom Provider LIME’s
quiet in all of this.
That’s
mainly because Mobile isn’t a money-maker for them as it is for Telecom
Provider Digicel; their real
revenues come from their Fixed Line and Broadband Services such as ADSL
(Asynchronous Digital Subscriber Line) and Frame Relay Services for Corporate
and Business Customers as laid out in my blog article
entitled “CWC
Report ending March 2014 indicates LIME Jamaica's improving Bottom Line -
Project Marlin heralds Solar Powered Telecom Provider to Reduce Operating Costs”.
Mobile
is mostly Prepaid customers and barely makes 10% of overall revenue. VoIP is an
issue, especially as it relates to the Telecom Tax and the Cess that’s paid
over to the USF (Universal Service Fund). So too is bypass….. just not so big
to warrant this much media attention as far as Telecom Provider LIME is concerned based on the nonchalant
response of Communications Manager at LIME,
Elon Parkinson, quote: “We continue to review all VoIP apps on our network”.
The
main reason why they’re co-operating with Telecom Provider Digicel is to prevent a united front
in response to Minister of Science, Technology, Energy and Mining Phillip
Paulwell’s insistence that Telecom Providers take action against bypass or face
the consequences as distilled in my blog article
entitled “How
US$1 Billion is lost from the USF and Telecoms Tax via Inbound International
Calling Bypass - LIME, Digicel and
Network Engineer French Connection”.
Viber is on the rebound
– Telecom Providers await the OUR’s Judgement
As
for Viber, they’ve become the latest cause
celeb, with the popularity of Viber soaring. If you never knew that they
offered free calling, you DEFINITELY known now. They’ve also rolled out updates
that many have been urged to download from the Apple iTunes Store and the Google Play Store to circumvent
Telecom Provider Digicel and
Telecom Provider LIME’s blockade.
Their
latest message to their user base in the Caribbean is taunting, quote: “We're
pleased to hear that you are able to use Viber again to communicate freely. Create
a group and spread the news among your friends”
It
seems to be working, as many report being able to continue using Viber after
updating their Viber App as stated in the article “Viber
reports uptick in traffic amid VoIP blockade - Telecoms effort described as bad
for business, education services”, Published Friday July 11, 2014,
published Richard Browne, Business Reporter, The Jamaica Gleaner.
So
was it worth it? Read on and you’ll see why it is…..and hence the reason why
the Telecom Providers took action, as the outcome is quite clear cut.
Telecom Providers await
OUR’s Judgement – USF Revenue for GOJ means they’ll win
So
was it worth it? In a word yes, as the Telecom Providers, being FDI (Foreign
Direct Investors) and thus signatories to BTA (Bilateral Trade Agreements), are
bound to the Government of Jamaica to seek binding legal arbitration through a
neutral agreed party acting as Mediator whenever disputes arise.
To
this end, the OUR, though not the appointed Telecom Regulator, is acting in
this stead, as it an issue that involves consumers and a service that’s part of
their regulatory ambit. The Telecom Providers, in agreeing to binding
arbitration with the OUR acting as mediator, thus have thirty days (30) to
cease and desist any action after the Mediator in the dispute between the
Telecom Providers and the CAC, as this is really a consumer affair.
Truth
be told, the GOJ is very interested in the Telecom Providers being allowed to
block the VoIP operators, especially as they’re getting revenue from the
Telecom Providers that’s helping to balance their Budget. It’s also funding the
USF and the Minister of Science, Technology, Energy and Mining’s ambitious
E-Learning II Tablet Program, which is perfectly legal by the way as pointed
out in my blog
article entitled “Ministry
of Science and Technology signs four Contractors in March 2014 to procure
Tablets - Test Pilot Project in September 2014 means Teachers can monetize
e-books”.
With
both Telecom Providers building out their respective 4G LTE Networks, it’s
reasonable to expect too, that they’d wish to shore up their revenue base as
they expend additional capital on their Network expansion. It may violate the
purest principles of Network Neutrality, but the truth be told, these VoIP are
breaking the law; they shouldn’t be rewarded for their “illegal” and
“parasitic” activity, even if only one Telecom Provider really has a problem
due to their revenue Stream being dependent on Voice Calling!
Given
that their demands are within the Telecommunications Act of 2012 and request
that VoIP Providers be registered to operate in Jamaica, sign contractual
arrangements and pay Toll Access Charge in order to terminate Calls on their
Network as pointed out in my Geezam blog
article entitled “How
Network Neutrality and International Calling can thrive as TATT mediates VoIP
Blockade by Digicel and LIME”, the
OUR is most likely to rule in the Telecom Providers Favour.
No comments:
Post a Comment